Screened reuse of completed activity observations

A complete text-only screening review examined two existing development snapshots, including disabled fields, nested prose and UI source. The Spanish snapshot had 377 string fields / 218,998 UTF-8 bytes; the English snapshot had 441 / 84,357. Exact duplicate string values were reviewed once and matched across occurrences. This was an AI assistant's eligibility judgment, not human moderation, media review, comprehensive certification or a publication decision.

The Spanish world received a research hold for eroticized nonconsensual sexual material. Its family 618ccc11-d73f-4f81-906f-6694f189e64f is excluded from both baseline and enriched candidates alongside the earlier held family. No passages are reproduced or exported, and no production status or creator message changed.

The English adult workplace/competitive-sports story was allowed for this exact text-only research snapshot. Its whole-JSON revision hash is cef1e6e29ea143c785ad25c6f01407849265ab439d6c1b19715c4c55cf7a5951. That decision permits a bounded reconstruction from its already completed model observations. It does not make the original unscreened job retrospectively valid or turn the other development worlds into approved candidates.

Reconstruction and limits

The new replay first applies the reviewed-snapshot entrypoint. Denied worlds never reach baseline, source or artifact work. For the one allowed story, it verifies all three observed packet hashes against the complete 80-field source stream, baseline hashes, proposal hashes, exact unique quotation locations and one original review decision per proposal. All fourteen original reviews remain included: seven supported and seven unsupported. No judgment was changed, and no model, embedding or ranking request occurred.

The existing deterministic artifact policy selects three separate supported bundles. Four further supported passages appear in the explicit overflow count; no review list was truncated. Invalid, ambiguous, conflict and duplicate counts are zero. Baseline parity passes. These are successful provenance and artifact construction checks, not semantic accuracy or recommendation uplift.

Inspection also exposes a quality question: source-order selection fills the three slots with two opening interactions and an earlier character/access passage, leaving later explicit trust, information-sharing, press-response and influence mechanics out. The selected earlier passage combines an unspecified discoverer with a clearly named reader access condition; its model rationale attributes the discovery to the reader more strongly than the quotation itself does. The original supported judgment remains visible rather than being silently corrected. Full source coverage and a passing quote check do not guarantee the best three story representations.

This one already-inspected development story is suitable for diagnosing bundle selection, not choosing weights or claiming generalization. A later candidate must make its whole-world selection policy explicit and evaluate it on a new eligible comparison set. The earlier failed ranking comparison remains the promotion evidence; production experimental ranking stays off.

Records

• Text-screening record: 9bfe907a9a1fb78aba93c0a2fe4674ea3d9d83a655182272b57ceebb32bb1309.
• Operator manifest file (two held families, one exact snapshot approval): ec47ef272b547f90eb20fb2cb45d52897b99fa17d1504bdf8e38ac58b3077c94.
• Reconstruction result: 402ee17c645bf27db1bdd831bcef9b28ae21c9142f1df45ae1b0e13c290530a6.
• Original immutable partial extraction result: b5e101f20d7aa43b9edc4c0021e7879bc2d1ab83a29471c379c1da62bb911384.

The new result records current consumed-module hashes, runner hash and Node/ICU versions. It is a retrospective reconstruction with recorded provenance, not a new frozen model experiment. The stopped full-development job remains stopped. No new provider charges, subscriptions, production writes or evaluation-cohort inspection were involved.

Additional language screening

The smallest still-unreviewed snapshot by serialized byte size in each of Chinese, Japanese and Spanish was selected for a further development screen. This size-based choice is not a random catalog sample or a quality benchmark. Complete string coverage, including disabled/nested/UI fields, was recorded:

Language	String fields	UTF-8 string bytes	Research decision
Chinese	126	7,405	Hold: eroticized captivity and forced reproductive exploitation.
Japanese	96	19,491	Hold: eroticized sexual assault and continuation despite resistance.
Spanish	117	52,654	Uncertain: adult premise, unresolved consent treatment in a content preset.

The uncertain case is not a finding of sexualized minors or a confirmed assault; it remains outside this research candidate set pending clarification. Both confirmed holds and uncertainty apply at family level and exclude baseline as well as enriched candidates. The updated operator manifest therefore has five family holds (one uncertain), one exact English snapshot approval and six other unreviewed development worlds. No multilingual artifact pass is claimed.

A separate replay preflight verifies that all three additional cases stop before baseline/evidence preparation. It produced no artifacts or provider calls. The original observation files and the earlier one-world reconstruction are unchanged.

• Additional screening record: 9749b598ffe8b8c9e121c78d25f3edd8347ebecd19ffa514e0f5b8701db151f6.
• Current operator manifest file, v2: cb2534cc2c03920d470fa922b4ea16de9c620d6dc16233d6ee7cc3e25e53a2f1.

These findings explain why publication, age-rating metadata or a supported action quote cannot independently authorize recommendation research. They do not alter production moderation or establish a catalog-wide prevalence estimate.